I think that there cannot be nothing more creative than the existence of whatever can be conceived by the human mind.
The illusion of earning or losing something intellectual has perhaps been crystallized among the great mass, and I can assure so thanks to the experiences I have lived so far around the various category of brain challenges. In the previous article, I matched the combination of the formal and rational meaning of corporal and mindful engagement with cable television networks. So, as previously discussed, we have unfolded that this is not possibly true but it may happen.
The objects of discussion of today’s article will be the intellectual asset generation and the intellectual asset deprivation or conscientious ceasing.
This is an interesting topic because I maintain it stays on the tip of a discrete and rational combination of circumstances and human characteristics. Then, this tip is not explainable by science or other sophisticated technical approaches. Thus, since this tip can be misleading to the various interpreters and to those who experience it, I believe it is now time to put some fingers into gear in order to discern a discrete solution to the irregular ‘ph’ of such events.
I would recommend myself not to get paranoid while describing this situation for the nth time. The recognition of certain aspects of life might derive from close life experiences, which in other terms mean those experiences that are lived within the physical context where one stays.
During the last period of my life, I never wanted to commit myself to a conflicting state of mind. However, the circumstances within the physical context, which I would like to take as the object for this check, have turned, say, concrete and intentional. That is why, from the multitude of events that can take place in the given context, there can actually be some real and factual threats directed to my address. Well, according to this eventuality, I would like to list some of the threats which, as demonstrated, might have the power to harm my stable and expected way of life. I will be clear and short in that. Put it simply, this is what makes me feel bad and frustrated during my daily life:
- Perculating noise of furniture coming from the attic at specific times of the day. Indicating perhaps that at a specific time, say 9.17, I should feel to be unlucky because the accustomed meaning associated to number 17 is the disgrace or unluck. Such noises are repetitive and it seems they persevere in their ‘action’ even after I call out for a truce. This happened many times. I wish I can find a way to end this conflicting phenomenon which I now regard as a real threat.
- General noise and powerful beating. This can be harmful when I am in the course of generating the so-called intellectual asset. For a better understanding of this matter, this kind of disturb actually takes place and does its job when my mind reaches a condition of happiness, high focus, and high performing attitude. So it can be glimpsed that I would like to maintain this enjoyable mind status because it helps me to do better work and to withstand the environment I am dealing with. It is simply like feeling good and trying not to feel bad. But unfortunately, potentially harmful circumstances might take place.
- The noise and the movement generated from outside my house. This may cause traumas and disturbs that might exacerbate the preferred condition of the mind and might endanger the legitimate sense of keeping the status.
- The presence of crazy thoughts, like the existence of wireless transfer between minds, which may toss a coin for a randomized outcome of the present mental status. In other words, I believe there should be limits to the creative hemisphere of the brain, there should be a limit to madness. Why? Because these limits are real.
- Other circumstances may affect a pleasant mind status which normally one should have no difficulties to keep and get used to. These circumstances, in my case, may depend on cable network contact or other sorts of incongruences like watching a particular thing when the eyes are resting and we are about to enjoy the stomach relaxation moment.
Why the creative hemisphere is supposed to follow the rules of certain limits? Well, according to the creative theory an individual, in a high and altered state of consciousness, may wrongly start to perceive to be inserted in a xyz environment, perfectly elaborated and visualized due to the higher functionality of the creative hemisphere. Why is this wrong? Because the creative hemisphere is a kind of good-willed creature. It would love to discover the reality of the place it can really reach with eyes, arms, and legs, and it wants to do this with the effort it really needs to adopt in order to carry on its tasks. I believe that other kinds of creative maneuvers, apart from the one I have described, have to be considered invalid. This is why, now, after this little introduction, I will try to undercover the fundamentals of the intellectual asset theory and place them in an uncontaminated context of living.
First, let’s recall the point. I have said that we can generate an intellectual asset and we can be deprived of it or we can cease it spontaneously. I personally recognize myself with this kind of representation, however, I do not have the certainty if anyone else would mirror themselves to this definition. This is because I was the only one, in my life spectrum, to have loudly spoken about this matter, whereas, other people I dealt with, never expressively mentioned nothing about this matter. That is the way I still doubt whether other fellows would be interested in this kind of matter. And so, according to my personal life experience, here are a few things I would like to say about this potential issue.
First, normally during a high-level performance, my mind remunerates me with a discrete quantity of positive hormones in order to let me do better the work I have to do. That is basically what happens. So I feel good, happy and motivated for what I am doing. Curiously, I am in a good mood and I can say I like it, therefore I do not want to feel differently. On the same line of thoughts, a given mind, let’s take mine, can be viewed as enriched of information, memory active, in some sense able to transmit powerful convertibles of any sort to the outside by speaking or engaging contact with a cable network; so, to sum up, this is what a mind can do eventually.
Who would ever be scared or attracted about that? Personally speaking, I have never taken a step toward the appreciation or even the seizure of any intellectual asset.
So firstly my question will be, how can ever whatever mental status be considered dangerous or appealable for the outside? What is the reason why a given target should retain himself or herself under precautionary measures in front of the presence of a potentially active intellectual asset detained by an individual?
These two are questions which I would like myself to answer but I guess it would be a long run. According to my viewpoint, we live in a world where the net of uncertainties, inside the Internet web and the Cybersecurity ever-growing dominion, especially, can be ultimately translated to the simple duality which defines the USELESS conflict between , say, two managers holding intellectual assets. Here I think is where the tipping point is reached among the worldly exchange of traumas. It should be logical to explain it now.
There is no need to feel anyone by a wireless tool. The thing is simple, in our life we felt a lot of sensations that our mind can easily recall if a very stimulus brights humanity and makes us look into our beloved events, in order to recall them as in the past we prayed them to happen. So I hope that, whoever thinks about the existence of a wireless connection among human brains, please, appreciate and love your happy memories and do not concentrate on the powerful convertibles which may come from them.
People on the television network, perhaps, have gathered information about me, then they considered the fact that I was watching and in some way giving opinions to their talking. I still state that any connection between brains and electric devices are to be considered false, then they may happen.
Hence I would like to say back that any attempt to violate my quiet living in the physical or in my working place, either if I recall and appreciate loving memories or I evaluate the submission of whatever convertible from my mind, or in simple terms I am in a good mood, I sincerely hope no one would send, I call them as they are, traumatic and hateful contents of any kind anymore. I do not want to live in a place where such things happen. And I believe I have exhausted the reader, if any, by saying whatever they should need to know about the activity I practice in house and what are the well-structured and naturally weighted limits of my mind which can never be overlapped or can never cause damage to an external being. I really hope I made myself clear of the fact that whatever my mind does, it does nothing to anybody; whatever happens around it, is alright. Of course, any man does something wrong, but doing something wrong means ‘doing something’. So for example, if writing this public post means that I am insulting or defaming someone for whatever reason, this should be regarded as wrongdoing. Therefore this article would be subjected to evaluation in order to ascertain whether a wrongful act has been committed.
Therefore I would conclude by saying that two types of outlaws should be recognized:
- those who commit wrongdoing
- those who send real authentic hateful content to an intellectual asset bearer, or in other words, to someone who is happy and focused (it seems to be easy to spot them)
I personally recall the day when I used to listen to music, or doing hard meditations while I was getting angry with someone, like for example the image of an ugly person I met in the past. It was amazing because it was like that the next day I could face new problems with a renewed combative and calibrated spirit which used to give me the confidence to overcome obstacles in my physical context life and in the workplace. I have always found useful and pertinent to re-work the state of frustration and regret that I accumulated during the days when difficulties emerged. I have been always living in peace with myself by practicing these kinds of regressive gauges, or something like that.
Today, it is fundamental to say that I rarely feel the need to re-work the unpleasant experiences in life, through meditation or other manners. My life is more serene and thanks to the knowledge I am currently gathering, especially with my university studies, I have found a better way to relieve myself against any unexpected mis-interpretation of issues of any sort which might unpredictably rise during the normal proceeding of the day.